Nowadays, in any field, websites are essential. Bloggers, businesspersons, politicians, and so on own a website for their purposes. Whether new or old, the function provided by the web hosting sites needs to be perfect for the client’s requirements. Fastcomet Vs. Bluehost, being in the business with so many intricacies, required to be reviewed.
Our Verdict in A Nutshell
Both web hosting sites provide you with essential services to their clients. Their target audience is large and the same. Thus, we jotted down some points to help us to understand the superiority of one in detail.
Round 1: Features & Ease of Use
Bluehost offers domain that is facilitated with features like an easy-to-use control panel(cPanel), fast servers, unlimited storage, and secure network, that too at a feasible cost, then, Bluehost is the best for you.
Contrarily, Fastcomet comes with a Cloud control panel, which is intuitive. The website servers are equipped with Cloudfare CDN, SSD, and SSL certifications, which increases reliability on the site.
Fastcomet proves itself no less than Bluehost in this round.
Round 2: Speed (Load Times)
Fastcomet | Bluehost |
1.24 | 1.45 |
A newly emerging web hosting site is dedicated to providing the best speed in the market. In this round, Fastcomet kills Bluehost by providing higher speed as compared to Bluehost. The response time needs to be monitored strictly to maintain SEO.
Also, the servers are strong enough to handle the traffic’s weightage, which is evident in the case of Fastcomet.
Fastcomet has proved itself as the best in the competition of Fastcomet Vs. Bluehost.
Round 3: Prices & Plans
Fastcomet | Bluehost |
FastCloud Plan: $2.49 per month | Basic Plan: $2.95 per month |
FastCloud Plus Plan: $3.70 per month | Plus Plan: $5.95 per month |
FastCloud Extra Plan: $4.99 per month | Choice Plus Plan: $4.95 per month |
Pro Plan: $13.95 per month |
The three plans offered by Fastcomet, namely, FastCloud, FastCloud Plus, and FastCloud Extra, are cheaper than the equivalent plans of Bluehost.
Bluehost’s initial pricing provides useful features, too. However, the renewal charges it asks for is double the price paid initially.
Therefore, while considering Fastcomet Vs. Bluehost, in the case of pricing, you can choose Fastcomet with a click.
Round 4: WordPress Integration
Fastcomet | Bluehost |
Mild | Easy |
Although WordPress.org has recommended Bluehost, Fastcomet proves itself no less. Fastcomet has launched its Managed WordPress hosting recently. It allows SSD (only cloud), powered cPanel, free domain transfer, free Cloudflare CDN, managed migrations, daily or weekly backups, 24/7 support with a money-back guarantee.
Thus, Fastcomet proves itself the best one compared to Bluehost or any other site in the market.
Round 5: Hosting Features
The features face-off is here. Let’s dive-in!
Fastcomet
- Constant renewal charge
- CDN Cloudfare is provided for free
- SSD disk space
- Datacenter as a choice
- Free domain
- Uptime of 99.99% is offered
- Protection from spam, directories are password protected
- Fast and secure
Bluehost
- Fast load times
- SSL certificate
- Site building is free
- The initial cost is pretty low
- Unmetered bandwidth
With the precision in the features offered by Fastcomet, it remains the winner in the race of Fastcomet Vs. Bluehost.
Round 6: Support
The ticketing system and live chat have proven effective in the case of Fastcomet. The support system of Fastcomet takes no time to help you out with the Support you require. Also, the agents appear to be quite experienced, knowledgeable, and eager.
Bluehost provides good support as well, which is fast and easy to understand. The agents are not well versed with the technologies used in Bluehost, decreasing the number of clients to this site.
Therefore, Fastcomet proves itself as the best provider of support and wins this round, too.
Round 7: Uptime & Security
Both Bluehost and Fastcomet assures you an uptime of 99.99%. Regarding the security, both offer IPAs blacklist, directories with password protection, spam protection, etc.
Also, Cloudflare being the best company in the market, facilitate both sites.
Therefore, both the sites are efficient in the matter of security and uptime.
Conclusion
We know that both web hosting sites are efficient, But the following point gives light to the better one:
- Bluehost, with its reputation, is reliable but costlier than Fastcomet.
- Fastcomet has emerged as a perfect model for all the web hosting sites and provides the best services.
It is essential to note that both the web hosting sites provide the same services, but the minute details must be looked into while buying services from these sites.
Fastcomet
Bluehost