While the market has widened its arena, web hosting sites have come up with various ideas that can best fit the clients. There are specific criteria that may state the sites as ideal. Therefore, we have brought you our outlook towards Bluehost Vs. AWS.
Our Verdict in A Nutshell
For starters, it can be said that Bluehost targets regular websites, whereas AWS is efficient in managing huge websites with high traffic.
While Bluehost is famous for its pocket-friendly shared hosting plans, AWS performs the best in Cloud hosting.
Round 1: Features & Ease of Use
Contrary to it, Bluehost is the most reliable name in web hosting history and facilitates its clients with easy services, handy details, and a wide range of choices at a pocket-friendly rate. cPanel adds up to the ease of use.
On the other hand, AWS is a web service provider that gives you a chance to customize your plan and pay accordingly. It offers you basic features like Linux OS or Windows, security, and extensive server support.
So, when it comes to ease of use, Bluehost is easier to handle (cPanel configurations)
Round 2: Speed (Load Times)
| Bluehost Speed Time | AWS Speed Time |
| 1.45 seconds | 1.9 seconds |
While talking about speed for Bluehost Vs. AWS, Bluehost comes out as the faster site. The loading speed of AWS is quite average, whereas Bluehost stands out with a speed above average.
However, it is said that AWS has the most comprehensive configurations of all. So, while adding up the specifications, one can increase the accessibility, and thus, the speed can be improved.
Since the specifications are charged on unknown costs, Bluehost can be referred to as the winner of this round.
Round 3: Prices & Plans
| Bluehost | AWS |
| Basic Plan: $2.95 per month | |
| Plus Plan: $5.95 per month | As per the features selected. |
| Choice Plus Plan: $4.95 per month | |
| Pro Plan: $13.95 per month |
In addition to the plans, Bluehost offers the best upgrades like a free domain for a year, CDN, SSL certificate, Office 365 (for 30 days), domain privacy, automated backup, and Dedicated IP.
The Choice Plus plan is recommended, which has added privacy and security features.
The pricing of AWS hosting remains ambiguous. But, since they charge on every configuration one adds up, it might prove to be a costlier option as compared to any other web hosting sites around.
Undoubtedly, Bluehost has proven itself to be better among the two in the race of Bluehost Vs. AWS.
Round 4: WordPress Integration
| Bluehost WordPress Integration | AWS WordPress Integration |
| Easy | Mild |
WordPress in both sites is handled differently. Bluehost, being recommended officially by WordPress.org, stands out as the best among the two. Over a decade (since 2005), Bluehost has the trust of WordPress.org, which speaks for itself.
On the other hand, AWS offers huge scalability, which is apt for websites that have numerous visitors every day.
So, with the trust of WordPress and the age-old experience in the market, Bluehost stands out as the best web hosting site.
Round 5: Hosting Features
The most significant turn of the article, the feature-face-off, is here:
Bluehost
- Fast and secure
- Efficient WordPress Integration
- Uptime of about 99.99% is assured
- SSL certificate is provided for free to ensure security
- Free migrations
- Site loading speed-up through Cloudflare CDN
- Site builders for free
- Customized cPanel
- Apt for small as well as large business
- Additional security features are present as well
AWS
- Easy customization choice for the clients
- Offers data encryption
- Most comprehensive features
- Offers great uptime
- Fast and secure
With the given features offered and the lack of clarity in the pricing and plans, Bluehost stands out and wins the race.
Round 6: Support
Both the sites offer 24/7 support through live chat, phone, and email. But there are comprehensive tutorials found to configure Bluehost. This is not the case in AWS.
So, in terms of support, both stand firm, but Bluehost might be referred to as superior because of the little configurations.
Round 7: Uptime & Security
The uptime assured by Bluehost is 99.99%, whereas AWS is relatively slow.
The security features like basic malware check, SSL add up to Bluehost’s efficiency.
But we can say that AWS assures the identity and access management through IAM regarding security.
However, with the detailed security of Bluehost, it can be referred to as the best in this round.
Conclusion
Both Bluehost Vs. AWS consists of exceptional features, but the following can be kept in mind while choosing one among the two:
- AWS is apt for you if you want to customize your options
- Go for Bluehost if cost, quality, traffic management, and easy accessibility is your concern.
One must choose the site which can be held upon in the long race.
Bluehost
AWS